US firm Fortera advances scalable carbon capture and mineralisation processes within the cement sector, attracting investment from Presidio Ventures and promising a significant cut in industry emissions amid growing global demand and decarbonisation efforts.
The cement sector sits at the nexus of a major decarbonisation challenge for heavy industry: it is indispensable to construction yet intrinsically carbon‑intensive because the primary chemical reaction that produces clinker releases CO₂. Industry estimates place the sector’s share of global emissions at roughly 7% and project continued demand growth in regions such as India and Africa, underscoring the need for scalable mitigation approaches. According to the International Energy Agency, the sector is the third‑largest industrial energy consumer and, under current trajectories, direct cement emissions could rise without substantial intervention. The World Cement Association likewise highlights that the release of CO₂ from limestone decomposition remains the core technical hurdle to full decarbonisation.
Presidio Ventures, the US venture arm of Sumitomo Corporation, has moved to address that gap through an equity and commercial engagement with Fortera, a US firm developing a process that captures process CO₂ from clinker manufacture and mineralises it into cementitious material. Myles Himeno, Director at Presidio Ventures, framed the rationale succinctly: “The cement and concrete industry accounts for approximately 7–8% of global CO₂ emissions, making it one of the largest single sources of emissions worldwide.”
Presidio judged Fortera’s approach on three practical criteria: it tackles emissions at the clinker stage where most process CO₂ originates; it has advanced beyond lab scale into commercial operation; and it is compatible with incumbent supply chains. “Fortera possesses a technology capable of reducing CO₂ emissions from the cement manufacturing process , which represents over 90% of total emissions in this industry, by 50–60%, giving it the potential for substantial market impact. Based on this significance, we decided to invest in the company,” Himeno said.
Fortera’s ReCarb® process is presented as a bolt‑on to existing plants, enabling producers to retain conventional raw materials, kiln systems and logistics while turning emitted CO₂ into a usable binder. That integration strategy lowers barriers to adoption compared with routes that demand novel feedstocks or wholesale plant redesign. “At the time of our investment, Fortera had already begun commissioning a 15,000-ton commercial-scale plant, positioning it as one of the closest startups in the field to full-scale implementation,” Himeno added.
The company has publicly reported operational progress in California: its industrial facility captures several thousand tonnes of CO₂ annually and manufactures low‑carbon cement products for the ready‑mix market, a step that Fortera and its backers say validates the technology’s commercial mechanics. The firm also cites third‑party partnerships and capital from corporate climate funds as evidence of market traction; industry observers note that such ties are important to bridge early demonstrations and wide deployment.
Independent research points to a complementary dynamic within cement materials themselves: natural and engineered carbonation processes can re‑uptake a meaningful share of process emissions over an asset’s life. A 2024 analysis published in Scientific Data estimated global cement CO₂ uptake approaching nearly one gigatonne per year, equivalent to more than half of contemporaneous process emissions. While that uptake does not eliminate the need to abate kiln‑stage emissions, it illustrates an additional pathway to lower net lifecycle intensity when combined with process capture.
Sumitomo’s interest extends beyond capital. The group has signed a memorandum of understanding with Fortera and Sumitomo Osaka Cement to study the feasibility of deploying Fortera’s process in Japan , a market that the company describes as advanced on decarbonisation policy and therefore strategically important for global roll‑out. “Japan is among the most advanced countries in Asia in terms of decarbonization initiatives and therefore represents an important milestone for Fortera as it plans its global expansion. We believe there is substantial value in supporting the deployment of Fortera’s technology in the Japanese market,” Himeno said. Sumitomo’s existing assets in cement logistics and ready‑mixed concrete could create commercial routes for technology adoption, the firm argues.
The sector’s scale and recent emissions trajectory underline the urgency. A separate industry study shows that sectoral CO₂ emissions more than doubled over the past two decades, driven principally by growing cement demand in emerging markets; global emissions from cement were reported at more than 2.6 billion tonnes in 2021. Against that backdrop, the IEA’s Cement Technology Roadmap calls for a portfolio of measures, including material efficiency, alternative fuels, clinker substitution and carbon capture, to trim emissions substantially by mid‑century.
For corporate investors and industrial adopters, the critical questions now are cost, durability and certification. Fortera asserts its product meets required performance metrics and, in recent months, announced laboratory and standards milestones intended to demonstrate equivalence with conventional cements. Such verification will be central to convincing asset owners and contractors to specify alternative binders at scale, particularly for infrastructure with long design lives.
Presidio frames its investment as targeted, pragmatic support for a technology that aligns with existing manufacturing ecosystems and addresses the largest single source of emissions in cementmaking. “Leveraging this strong business foundation, we believe we can make a meaningful contribution not only in supporting the marketing of Fortera’s technology in Japan, but also in engaging potential partner cement manufacturers,” Himeno said.
As the industry pursues multiple decarbonisation levers, solutions that can be retrofitted into current plants and validated against performance standards may accelerate uptake. Nevertheless, analysts caution that a single technology will not suffice; meeting deep decarbonisation goals will require coordinated policy, demand‑side measures, material innovation and large‑scale deployment of capture and sequestration across diverse regional markets. Fortera’s progress, and the corporate backing it has secured, will be watched closely as a test case for whether capture‑and‑mineralisation can move from demonstration to widespread industrial application.
- https://www.sumitomocorp.com/en/us/scoa/publications/visions_january_2026_2 – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://www.iea.org/news/cement-technology-roadmap-plots-path-to-cutting-co2-emissions-24-by-2050 – The International Energy Agency’s Cement Technology Roadmap outlines strategies to reduce CO₂ emissions by 24% by 2050. The cement sector is the third-largest industrial energy consumer globally, responsible for 7% of industrial energy use and about 7% of global emissions. Despite increasing efficiencies, direct carbon emissions from the cement industry are expected to rise by 4% globally by 2050 under the IEA Reference Technology Scenario, highlighting the need for significant efforts to reduce emissions from cement makers.
- https://www.worldcementassociation.org/about-us/sustainability – The World Cement Association supports full decarbonisation of the cement industry. Cement is essential for global development, with production expected to continue growing beyond 2050, particularly in India and Africa. However, cement accounts for 2.5 Gt of CO₂ emissions, equating to about 7% of the world’s total. The release of CO₂ from the decomposition of limestone in the cement kiln is inherent to cement production, posing a significant challenge in the shift to a low-carbon economy.
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-024-04234-8 – A study published in Scientific Data estimates that in 2023, the global annual cement CO₂ uptake reached 0.93 Gt/yr, equivalent to 52.32% of the CO₂ process emissions from cement production during the same period. The majority of the carbon footprint of the cement industry originates from the decomposition of alkaline carbonates during clinker production. Recent studies have demonstrated that calcium oxides and other alkaline oxides in cement materials can sequester CO₂ through the carbonation process, partially offsetting the carbon emissions generated during cement production.
- https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240412693182/en/Fortera-Lowers-Carbon-Emissions-with-Opening-of-its-First-Industrial-Green-Cement-Plant – Fortera has opened its first industrial green cement plant in Redding, California, marking a significant step in reducing carbon emissions from cement production. The plant captures CO₂ emitted during cement production and permanently sequesters it by mineralizing the CO₂ into ready-to-use cement. This process reduces carbon emissions by 70% on a ton-for-ton basis and eliminates feedstock waste associated with traditional concrete production. The facility captures 6,600 tons of CO₂ annually and produces 15,000 tons of low-carbon ReAct® cement.
- https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251216755972/en/Forteras-ReAct-Becomes-First-Low-Carbon-Cement-to-Meet-All-Six-ASTM-C1157-Categories – Fortera’s ReAct® cement has become the first low-carbon cement to meet all six ASTM C1157 categories. ReAct delivers compressive strength comparable to ordinary Portland cement at 28 days within 2 days. Its chemical durability eliminates common degradation mechanisms in concrete infrastructure, and its low drying shrinkage reduces cracking, improving long-term structural integrity. ReAct is produced using Fortera’s ReCarb® technology, which integrates with existing cement manufacturing infrastructure to transform industrial CO₂ emissions into ready-to-use cement.
- https://www.globalcement.com/news/item/14286-cement-sector-co2-emissions-double-in-20-years – A study revealed that the total volume of CO₂ emissions released during cement production has more than doubled over the past 20 years. In 2021, CO₂ emissions from cement manufacturing amounted to 2.6 billion tonnes, more than 7% of all emissions. In 2001, the CO₂ emissions from cement production were just 1.2 billion tonnes. Driven by China, the global cement sector’s CO₂ emissions have now more than tripled in the 30 years since 1992, recently increasing by 2.6% a year.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The article was published in January 2026, making it current. However, the content references events and investments from 2023 and 2024, which may affect the perceived freshness of the information.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The quotes attributed to Myles Himeno, Director at Presidio Ventures, are consistent with previous statements made in 2023 and 2024. This suggests the quotes may have been reused, potentially reducing the originality of the content.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The article is published on Sumitomo Corporation’s official website, which is a reputable source. However, as a corporate publication, it may present information with a particular perspective, potentially affecting objectivity.
Plausibility check
Score:
8
Notes:
The claims about Fortera’s technology and its potential impact on CO₂ emissions are plausible and align with known industry trends. However, the lack of independent verification from external sources raises some concerns about the accuracy of these claims.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The article presents information that is not fully original, with reused quotes and a lack of independent verification. The reliance on corporate sources with vested interests and the inclusion of promotional content further diminish its credibility. Therefore, the content does not meet the necessary standards for publication under our editorial indemnity.

