India’s cement industry is recognising the crucial role of Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) in balancing sector growth with its net-zero ambitions, amid policy, infrastructure, and economic challenges shaping its pathway.
Cement’s path to deep decarbonisation in India is increasingly framed as a problem of scale, policy and shared infrastructure rather than of technology alone. The industry has made measurable gains through energy efficiency, alternative fuels and clinker substitution, but those levers are constrained: process emissions from limestone calcination account for roughly 60–65% of sectoral CO2 and cannot be eliminated by fuel switching or renewable energy. According to industry roadmaps and international assessments, Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) is therefore indispensable if India’s cement sector is to reconcile continued capacity growth with net-zero ambitions.
The technical and economic realities are stark. Global production of cement is around 4 billion tonnes per year and the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report classifies cement as hard-to-abate because calcination emits CO2 irrespective of the energy source. The IEA and the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA) estimate that conventional measures can at best deliver roughly 50–60% emissions reductions, leaving the residual process emissions to be addressed by CCUS. The IEA further projects that global CCUS deployment in cement must scale from under 1 million tonnes of CO2 captured today to more than 1.2 billion tonnes annually by 2050 to meet net-zero pathways.
Early commercial projects abroad and foundational R&D at home point to a feasible, if challenging, route. Europe and North America now host several medium-scale projects, examples include the Brevik CCS project in Norway, enabled by strong policy incentives, public funding and shared transport-and-storage infrastructure. These experiences underline that capture costs remain high (often quoted in the range of US$80–150 per tonne of CO2) and that projects scale fastest where governments bridge the viability gap through carbon pricing, grant support and long-term offtake mechanisms.
India is at a pilot-and-demonstration stage but gaining momentum. According to the Department of Science and Technology, five cement-sector CCU testbeds involving academia–industry partnerships and firms such as JSW Cement, Dalmia Cement and JK Cement are validating mineralisation and CO2-cured concrete applications at small daily capture rates. The GCCA–TERI “Decarbonisation Roadmap for the Indian Cement Industry: Net zero CO₂ emissions by 2070” provides a sectoral blueprint that maps a pragmatic sequence: pilot now, cluster in the 2030s to reap economies of scale, and institutionalise CCUS by mid-century so low-carbon cement becomes mainstream. According to the roadmap launched by GCCA India and The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), the sector’s interim targets align with national goals and underline the need for policy certainty and financial incentives.
Policy action and cluster thinking are decisive. International experience shows cluster-based CO2 transport and storage infrastructure can reduce unit costs by 30–50% compared with stand-alone projects. The IEA and sector analyses stress that more than 70% of advanced industrial CCUS projects worldwide have progressed because of sustained government intervention through carbon pricing, capital grants and contracts that de-risk revenue streams. In India, policymakers are moving: participants at a NITI Aayog workshop highlighted the need for a CCUS Mission, with Prof. Ajay Kumar Sood, Principal Scientific Adviser to the Prime Minister, and Dr. V.K. Saraswat of NITI Aayog emphasising research, carbon pricing and climate finance. Pankaj Agarwal, Secretary, Ministry of Power, announced the government is preparing a comprehensive CCUS Mission to support deployment.
Economics remain the principal barrier. Independent estimates from research institutes show the capital and operating cost burden for net-zero cement in India is large; one study cited projected capital needs running into the hundreds of billions of US dollars and significant annual operating costs by mid-century, with potential upward pressure on cement prices that could be especially painful in a low-margin, price-competitive domestic market. As noted by industry leaders, without mechanisms such as viability gap funding, concessional finance, tax incentives and tradable carbon credits, CCUS risks remaining confined to demonstrations.
Industry voices frame CCUS as both an unavoidable compliance cost and an opportunity for strategic value creation. Lovish Ahuja, Chief Sustainability Officer, Dalmia Cement (Bharat), said CCUS “shifts from a future liability to a strategic opportunity” if policy, finance and societal acceptance align, and argued that domestic innovation could become an exportable industrial capability. Milan R Trivedi, Vice President, Shree Digvijay Cement, emphasised the role of robust, long-term carbon pricing and tradable credits under schemes like India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) to de-risk capital deployment and create green-premium market signals. MM Rathi, Joint President – Power Plants, Shree Cement, cautioned that large-scale adoption in India is realistically expected post‑2035, contingent on enabling infrastructure and policy frameworks.
Technologies need to be matched to plant realities. The incumbent, amine-based post-combustion capture is mature and favoured for retrofits but carries a substantial energy penalty and cost. Process‑integrated approaches such as indirect calcination (LEILAC/Calix), calcium looping and hybrid systems offer higher theoretical capture rates and lower regeneration penalties but are at pilot or demonstration scale and will require careful integration with high‑particulate, high‑temperature cement operations. Yash Agarwal, Co‑Founder of Carbonetics Carbon Capture, highlighted the role of digital tools and plant-specific simulation, “digital twins”, to reduce operational disruption and speed troubleshooting during deployment.
Utilisation can deliver early revenue and learning but has strict limits. The IEA and sector studies estimate current utilisation pathways, concrete curing, mineralisation into aggregates, precipitated calcium carbonate and niche chemicals, could absorb only about 5–10% of captured CO2 at typical plants. The IPCC cautions that most CCU routes do not guarantee permanent storage unless CO2 is mineralised or locked into long‑lived materials, leaving geological storage as the only route for deep, permanent abatement at scale. India’s geology offers credible storage options in deep saline aquifers, depleted hydrocarbon fields and basalt formations such as the Deccan Traps, supporting the case for hub-based models where multiple emitters share transport and storage assets.
A sequenced, mission-oriented programme is the pragmatic pathway. Industry roadmaps and international evidence converge on a phased approach: establish and validate pilot technologies today; develop regional clusters and shared CO2 infrastructure through public investment and public–private partnerships in the 2030s to lower unit costs and enhance bankability; and use carbon markets, green public procurement and blended finance to mainstream CCUS before mid‑century. The GCCA–TERI roadmap and government deliberations collectively stress that success will depend less on a single technology than on coordinated governance, financing instruments, carbon‑literate skills and cross‑sectoral planning.
The stakes go beyond industrial compliance: cement underpins India’s infrastructure and housing growth, while global markets increasingly factor carbon intensity into procurement. Paul Baruya, Director of Strategy and Sustainability, FutureCoal, summarised the scale of the task: “With global cement production at around 4 gigatonnes and still growing, cement decarbonisation is not a niche undertaking, it is a large‑scale industrial transition.” For industry leaders and policymakers alike, the choice is clear: treat CCUS as a strategic, mission‑level investment in competitiveness and climate alignment, or accept that the hardest emissions will remain unaddressed even as other sectors decarbonise.
If India is to keep building while sharply reducing the sector’s climate footprint, the coming decade must convert pilots into practicable clusters, backed by durable policy frameworks, blended finance and publicly planned CO2 transport and storage infrastructure. Only then can CCUS move from a high‑cost marginal solution to a mainstream industrial capability enabling the cement sector to meet both developmental and net‑zero objectives.
– Kanika Mathur
- https://indiancementreview.com/2026/01/19/from-vision-to-action-fornnax-global-growth-strategy-for-2026/ – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://www.teriin.org/press-release/gcca-india-and-teri-launch-decarbonisation-roadmap-indian-cement-industry-net-zero – The Global Cement and Concrete Association India (GCCA India), in collaboration with The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), launched the ‘Decarbonisation Roadmap for the Indian Cement Industry: Net zero CO₂ emissions by 2070’. This initiative aligns with India’s commitment to net-zero emissions and reflects the cement sector’s aspiration to lead in climate action. India, as the world’s second-largest cement producer, accounts for 8% of the global installed capacity and contributes approximately 7% of India’s total CO₂ emissions. The roadmap outlines a structured pathway for the Indian cement sector to achieve net-zero CO₂ by 2070, with an interim target for 2047, in line with the vision of ‘Viksit Bharat’. Developed through a collaborative effort involving industry leaders, research institutions, academia, and sectoral experts, the roadmap emphasizes the need for strong policy support and financial incentives from the government to achieve these aspirations.
- https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/cement-industry-needs-35-45-emissions-reduction-via-ccus-to-achieve-net-zero-by-2070/117346290 – The Indian cement sector, responsible for 5.8% of the country’s total CO₂ emissions, requires carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies to achieve 35-45% emissions reduction and meet the net-zero target by 2070. This was highlighted at a workshop organized by NITI Aayog at Vigyan Bhawan. The workshop, titled ‘Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) in the Indian Cement Sector,’ brought together government officials, industry leaders, researchers, and academicians to discuss decarbonization strategies. The Indian cement industry, with an installed capacity of 600 million tonnes and annual production of 391 million tonnes, is pivotal to the country’s infrastructure development and contributes significantly to its economy. ‘CCUS is an indispensable tool to address emissions in the cement sector, which is critical for achieving India’s long-term climate goals,’ said Prof. Ajay Kumar Sood, Principal Scientific Adviser to the Prime Minister. He emphasized the importance of balancing economic growth with environmental targets and advancing research and development to overcome challenges in decarbonizing this hard-to-abate sector. Dr. V.K. Saraswat, Member, NITI Aayog, stated that the cement industry plays a key role in the Asia-Pacific region, which is witnessing rapid growth in the global cement market. ‘Carbon capture and utilization technologies, combined with clean energy initiatives, are essential to reducing emissions in the cement sector,’ he said. He further highlighted the importance of carbon pricing and climate finance in supporting decarbonization efforts. India possesses significant potential for CCUS, with regions such as the Krishna-Godavari Basin, Deccan Traps, and mature oil and gas fields offering substantial CO₂ storage capacity. Innovative utilization pathways, including producing methanol, biodegradable plastics, and value-added chemicals, were discussed as potential solutions for creating a low-carbon future. Pankaj Agarwal, Secretary, Ministry of Power, announced that the government is preparing a comprehensive CCUS Mission to support these efforts. Ranjith Rath, CMD, Oil India Limited, emphasized the need for innovative solutions and geo-sequestration techniques to mitigate emissions effectively.
- https://indiancementreview.com/2025/02/12/adopting-ccus-technologies-requires-breaking-silos/ – Despite progress, several systemic obstacles hinder the mass deployment of CCUS in India’s cement industry. Technology readiness remains a fundamental issue: apart from MEA-based capture, most technologies are not commercially mature in high-volume cement plants. Furthermore, CCUS is costly. Studies by CEEW estimate that achieving net-zero cement in India would require around US$ 334 billion in capital investments and US$ 3 billion annually in operating costs by 2050, potentially raising cement prices between 19–107 per cent. This is particularly problematic for an industry where companies frequently operate at capacity utilisations of only 65–70 per cent and remain locked in fierce price competition. Building out transport and storage infrastructure compounds the difficulty, since many cement plants lie far from suitable geological CO₂ storage sites. Moreover, retrofitting capture plants onto operational cement production lines adds technical integration struggles, as capture systems must function reliably under the high-particulate and high-temperature environment of cement kilns. Overcoming these hurdles requires a multi-pronged approach rooted in policy, finance, and global cooperation. Policy support is vital to bridge the cost gap through instruments like production-linked incentives, preferential green cement procurement, tax credits, and carbon pricing mechanisms. Strategic planning to develop shared CO₂ transport and storage infrastructure, ideally in industrial clusters, would significantly lower costs and risks. International coordination can also accelerate adoption. The Global Cement and Concrete Association’s net-zero roadmap provides a collaborative template, while North–South technology transfer offers developing countries access to proven technologies. Financing mechanisms such as blended finance, green bonds tailored for cement decarbonisation and multilateral risk guarantees will reduce capital barriers. An integrated value-chain approach will be critical. Coordinated development of industrial clusters allows multiple emitters—cement, steel, and chemicals—to share common CO₂ infrastructure, enabling economies of scale and lowering unit capture costs. Public–private partnerships can further pool resources to build this ecosystem. Ultimately, decarbonisation is neither optional nor niche for Indian cement. It is an imperative driven by India’s growth trajectory, environmental sustainability commitments, and changing global markets where carbon intensity will define trade competitiveness. With compliance obligations already mandated under CCTS, the cement industry must accelerate decarbonisation rapidly over the next two years to meet binding reduction targets. The challenge is to balance industrial development with ambitious climate goals, securing both economic resilience and ecological sustainability. The pathway forward depends on decisive governmental support, cross-sectoral innovation, global solidarity, and forward-looking corporate action. The industry’s future lies in reframing decarbonisation not as a burden but as an investment in competitiveness, climate alignment and social responsibility.
- https://indiancementreview.com/2025/03/25/highlighting-the-future-of-smart-sustainable-infra/ – Moving CCUS in cement from pilots to practice requires a sequenced roadmap aligning technology maturity, infrastructure development, and policy support: the IEA estimates that achieving net zero will require CCUS to scale from less than 1 Mt of CO₂ captured today to over 1.2 Gt annually by 2050, while the GCCA Net Zero Roadmap projects CCUS contributing 30 per cent to 40 per cent of total cement-sector emissions reductions by mid-century, alongside efficiency, alternative fuels, and clinker substitution. MM Rathi, Joint President – Power Plants, Shree Cement, says, ‘The Indian cement sector is currently at a pilot to early demonstration stage of CCUS readiness. A few companies have initiated small-scale pilots focused on capturing CO₂ from kiln flue gases and exploring utilisation routes such as mineralisation and concrete curing. CCUS has not yet reached commercial integration due to high capture costs (US$ 80-150 per tonne of CO₂), lack of transport and storage infrastructure, limited access to storage sites, and absence of long-term policy incentives. While Europe and North America have begun early commercial deployment, large-scale CCUS adoption in India is more realistically expected post-2035, subject to enabling infrastructure and policy frameworks.’ Early pilots—such as India’s DST-backed CCU testbeds and Europe’s first commercial-scale plants—serve as learning platforms to validate integration, costs, and operational reliability, but large-scale deployment will depend on cluster-based scale-up, as emphasised by the IPCC AR6, which highlights the need for early CO₂ transport and storage planning to avoid long-term emissions lock-in. For India, the GCCA–TERI India Roadmap identifies CCUS as indispensable for achieving net-zero by 2070, following a pragmatic pathway: pilot today to build confidence, cluster in the 2030s to reduce costs, and institutionalise CCUS by mid-century so that low-carbon cement becomes the default, not a niche, in the country’s infrastructure growth. Conclusion Cement will remain indispensable to India’s development, but its long-term viability hinges on addressing its hardest emissions challenge—process CO₂ from calcination—which efficiency gains, alternative fuels, and clinker substitution alone cannot eliminate; global evidence from the IPCC, IEA, and GCCA confirms that Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) is the only scalable pathway capable of delivering the depth of reduction required for net zero. With early commercial projects emerging in Europe and structured pilots underway in India, CCUS has moved beyond theory into a decisive decade where learning, localisation, and integration will shape outcomes; however, success will depend less on technology availability and more on collective execution, including coordinated policy frameworks, shared transport and storage infrastructure, robust carbon markets, and carbon-literate capabilities. For India, a deliberate transition from pilots to practice—anchored in cluster-based deployment, supported by public–private partnerships, and aligned with national development and climate goals—can transform CCUS from a high-cost intervention into a mainstream industrial solution, enabling the cement sector to keep building the nation while sharply reducing its climate footprint.
- https://www.teriin.org/press-release/gcca-india-and-teri-launch-decarbonisation-roadmap-indian-cement-industry-net-zero – The Global Cement and Concrete Association India (GCCA India), in collaboration with The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), launched the ‘Decarbonisation Roadmap for the Indian Cement Industry: Net zero CO₂ emissions by 2070’. This initiative aligns with India’s commitment to net-zero emissions and reflects the cement sector’s aspiration to lead in climate action. India, as the world’s second-largest cement producer, accounts for 8% of the global installed capacity and contributes approximately 7% of India’s total CO₂ emissions. The roadmap outlines a structured pathway for the Indian cement sector to achieve net-zero CO₂ by 2070, with an interim target for 2047, in line with the vision of ‘Viksit Bharat’. Developed through a collaborative effort involving industry leaders, research institutions, academia, and sectoral experts, the roadmap emphasizes the need for strong policy support and financial incentives from the government to achieve these aspirations.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The article was published on January 19, 2026, and discusses Fornnax’s global growth strategy for 2026. Similar content has been published in other reputable sources, such as Waste Management World on January 15, 2026 ([waste-management-world.com](https://waste-management-world.com/business/from-vision-to-action-fornnax-global-growth-strategy-for-2026/?utm_source=openai)), RecyclingInside on January 13, 2026 ([recyclinginside.com](https://recyclinginside.com/from-vision-to-action-fornnax-global-growth-strategy-for-2026/?utm_source=openai)), and Tyre and Rubber Recycling on January 12, 2026 ([tyreandrubberrecycling.com](https://www.tyreandrubberrecycling.com/articles/uncategorised/kundaria-outlines-fornnax-global-growth-strategy-for-2026/?utm_source=openai)). The earliest known publication date of substantially similar content is January 12, 2026. The article appears to be a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. However, the presence of similar content across multiple reputable sources suggests that the information may have been disseminated widely, potentially reducing the originality of the content.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes from Jignesh Kundaria, Director & CEO of Fornnax. Similar quotes appear in other reputable sources, such as Waste Management World ([waste-management-world.com](https://waste-management-world.com/business/from-vision-to-action-fornnax-global-growth-strategy-for-2026/?utm_source=openai)) and RecyclingInside ([recyclinginside.com](https://recyclinginside.com/from-vision-to-action-fornnax-global-growth-strategy-for-2026/?utm_source=openai)). The earliest known usage of these quotes is January 12, 2026. The repetition of these quotes across multiple sources suggests they may have been part of a press release or official statement. While the quotes are consistent, their widespread appearance raises questions about the originality and independence of the content.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The article is published on India Cement Review, a niche publication focusing on the cement industry. While it is a specialist source, it is not as widely recognized as major news organizations like the BBC or Reuters. The content appears to be a press release, which is common in industry-specific publications. The reliance on a single, niche source for the information may limit the breadth and independence of the reporting.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims made in the article align with Fornnax’s known activities and recent developments, such as the establishment of a new manufacturing facility and expansion into new recycling applications. These developments have been reported in other reputable sources, including Waste Management World ([waste-management-world.com](https://waste-management-world.com/business/from-vision-to-action-fornnax-global-growth-strategy-for-2026/?utm_source=openai)) and RecyclingInside ([recyclinginside.com](https://recyclinginside.com/from-vision-to-action-fornnax-global-growth-strategy-for-2026/?utm_source=openai)). The consistency of these claims across multiple sources supports their plausibility.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The article presents information about Fornnax’s global growth strategy for 2026, largely derived from a press release. Similar content has been published in other reputable sources, indicating that the information is not original. The reliance on a single, niche source and the lack of independent verification raise concerns about the credibility and reliability of the content. Given these factors, the article does not meet the standards for publication under standard editorial indemnity.

