As US electricity demand surges from industry and data centres, virtual power plants and behind-the-meter solutions emerge as cost-effective alternatives to new generation capacity, promising to reshape the country’s energy landscape.
The United States faces a looming electricity gap as load grows sharply across industry and consumers alike, and solutions that avoid building vast new generation capacity are rising to the fore. Alongside transmission upgrades and new renewables, one of the most cost‑effective levers is reducing the energy we no longer need to produce: efficiency and behind‑the‑meter coordination that can be aggregated to act like generation.
A business model gaining traction in this space is “energy as a service,” in which a third party becomes the utility customer for a site, finances upgrades, and recovers its capital from a share of future savings. According to the lead report for this portfolio, one company pursuing that route takes on the utility account, modernises equipment and controls at multiple commercial sites, and is paid back over time from lower bills. For owners and operators of distributed facilities , retail chains, warehouses, light manufacturing , that approach offers immediate relief from operating costs while simultaneously reducing peak demand on the grid.
When many such upgraded sites are orchestrated with software, their combined load flexibility and storage can be dispatched in the same way a conventional power plant is. These virtual power plants (VPPs) knit together batteries, smart heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), refrigeration, EV chargers and other responsive assets so grid operators can shave peaks, defer generation or reduce reliance on fast‑starting fossil peakers. The U.S. Department of Energy describes VPPs as networks of distributed resources coordinated to provide cleaner, more affordable power, and industry analysis suggests VPPs are substantially more economical than traditional peaker plants during high‑demand hours. According to a Built In analysis, VPPs can be as much as 60% cheaper in those periods.
The urgency of deploying these solutions is underscored by recent federal and independent studies. The Department of Energy has reported a dramatic increase in data centre electricity demand: usage has roughly tripled in the past decade and is expected to double or triple again by 2028 as artificial‑intelligence workloads proliferate. The MIT Energy Initiative notes U.S. data centres already accounted for more than 4% of national electricity consumption in 2023 and could consume up to 9% by 2030; a single hyperscale facility can draw as much power as tens of thousands of homes. Separately, the American Public Power Association estimates combined growth from data centres and electric vehicles could add around 290 terawatt‑hours of demand by 2030.
Those escalating loads make avoided generation and flexible demand especially valuable. The Department of Energy has quantified the potential: expanding VPP capacity to between 80GW and 160GW by 2030 could cut roughly $10 billion each year from grid costs. Brattle Group modelling cited by industry commentators indicates VPP deployment could eliminate tens of billions in upfront utility capacity investments over a decade and save hundreds of millions annually in individual states.
Policy and market structures remain a gating factor. Federal rulemaking in 2020 directed regional grid operators to permit aggregated distributed energy resources to participate in wholesale markets, yet implementation across regions has been uneven. Where pilots exist, they show promise: Texas launched a programme in 2023 incentivising residential solar and battery installations that can export to the grid, and a private partnership involving major technology and generator firms is testing the use of smart thermostats and other devices to tap up to 1GW from homes. Nonetheless, some states and system operators continue to move slowly, citing technical complexity and regulatory barriers.
Meanwhile, federal funding for grid modernisation is evolving. The administration recently announced a new programme that will allocate $1.9 billion for grid upgrades with applications due in May 2026. That initiative replaces a previously planned tranche of funding under earlier GRIP rounds and represents a reduction relative to earlier commitments: the Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnerships authorised $10.5 billion across five years and disbursed most of its first rounds in 2023–24. Transmission and smart‑grid grants authorised under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law add additional, but separate, investment tools.
For industrial decarbonisation professionals, these trends matter on three fronts. First, energy efficiency and retrofit financing can deliver immediate reductions in site energy intensity and operating expenses while generating flexible capacity that utilities value. Second, when efficiency, storage and controls are aggregated into VPPs, they become traded assets that can monetise avoided capacity and ancillary services , creating new revenue streams for asset owners and service providers. Third, the scale of demand growth from hyperscalers and electrifying industry means that relying solely on new centralised generation or transmission will be costly and slow; a portfolio that combines targeted grid investment with distributed flexibility is likely the most pragmatic path to keep rates stable and emissions falling.
Adopting these solutions at scale will require aligned incentives: tariff structures that reward load flexibility, market rules that admit aggregated resources, and capital vehicles that bridge the gap between retrofit cost and long‑term savings. Where those pieces fall into place, thousands of upgraded commercial sites, fleets of batteries and networks of smart controllers can function as a decentralised, dispatchable system , effectively converting the electricity saved into the equivalent of generation capacity and reducing the need to build fossil‑fired peakers.
The technology and economics are increasingly persuasive; the remaining barriers are institutional. For businesses and policymakers aiming to decarbonise industry without destabilising the grid or blowing up customer bills, scaling financeable, aggregated behind‑the‑meter solutions and integrating them into wholesale markets offers one of the clearest pathways available.
- https://www.mollywood.co/p/turning-hundreds-of-mcdonalds-into – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-releases-new-report-evaluating-increase-electricity-demand-data-centers – The U.S. Department of Energy released a report indicating that data center energy use has tripled over the past decade and is projected to double or triple by 2028. This surge is driven by the expansion of data centers and the rise of artificial intelligence applications, contributing to increased electricity demand. The report underscores the need for solutions to meet this growing demand, reflecting robust industrial investments and technological innovation in the U.S. energy sector.
- https://www.energy.gov/lpo/virtual-power-plants – Virtual power plants (VPPs) are networks of distributed energy resources, such as batteries, smart thermostats, and solar panels, coordinated to function like a single power plant. VPPs enhance grid flexibility, integrate renewable energy sources, and provide demand flexibility, offering cleaner and more affordable power. The Department of Energy highlights the role of VPPs in improving energy affordability and supporting the transition to a more sustainable energy system.
- https://builtin.com/articles/virtual-power-plant – Virtual power plants (VPPs) aggregate distributed energy resources to operate as a unified power source, enhancing grid flexibility and reliability. VPPs can be up to 60% more cost-effective than traditional peaker plants during high electricity demand periods. They also contribute to reducing carbon emissions by utilising clean, distributed energy resources, supporting broader decarbonisation goals. Additionally, VPPs enable energy equity by allowing everyday energy users to participate in the energy market, sometimes earning compensation for their participation.
- https://www.energysage.com/energy-storage/what-is-a-virtual-power-plant/ – Virtual power plants (VPPs) are systems that aggregate distributed energy resources, such as home batteries, smart thermostats, and solar panels, to function as a single power plant. VPPs support grid resiliency by reducing the impact of single points of failure and can provide backup power during blackouts if they include energy storage devices with islanding capabilities. They offer a cost-effective and flexible solution to meet growing electricity demand and enhance grid stability.
- https://www.mitenergyinitiative.org/strategic-priorities/data-center-power-demand/ – The MIT Energy Initiative addresses the rapid increase in data center power demand, which has become a key challenge for hyperscale and colocated data centers, power generators, electrical grid operators, and regulators. U.S. data centers consumed more than 4% of the country’s total electricity in 2023, and by 2030, that fraction could raise to 9%. A single hyperscale data center can consume as much electricity as 50,000 homes. The initiative brings together MIT faculty members and scientists to work with utility, energy, and equipment companies and hyperscalers worldwide to address this complex challenge.
- https://www.publicpower.org/periodical/article/data-centers-ev-expansion-create-around-300-twh-increase-us-electricity-demand-2030 – The expansion of data centers and the widespread adoption of electric vehicles are expected to increase U.S. electricity demand by approximately 290 terawatt-hours (TWh) by 2030. This growth is driven by the energy-intensive nature of artificial intelligence applications and the electrification of transportation. The American Public Power Association highlights the need for strategic planning and infrastructure development to accommodate this surge in demand and ensure a reliable and sustainable power grid.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The article was published on March 16, 2026, which is recent. However, the concept of virtual power plants (VPPs) and energy as a service has been discussed in various sources, including the U.S. Department of Energy’s overview of VPPs ([energy.gov](https://www.energy.gov/lpo/virtual-power-plants?utm_source=openai)) and Tesla’s explanation of VPPs ([tesla.com](https://www.tesla.com/learn/what-is-a-virtual-power-plant?utm_source=openai)). The specific application to McDonald’s locations is novel, but the underlying concepts are not new.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes from Al Subbloie, CEO of Budderfly. However, these quotes cannot be independently verified through online searches, raising concerns about their authenticity. Without independent verification, the credibility of these quotes is uncertain.
Source reliability
Score:
5
Notes:
The article originates from mollywood.co, a niche publication. While it appears to be a personal blog or independent media outlet, its credibility is uncertain due to the lack of verifiable information about the publication’s editorial standards and practices. The absence of a clear editorial board or established reputation raises questions about the reliability of the content.
Plausibility check
Score:
6
Notes:
The concept of aggregating energy resources from multiple commercial sites to form a virtual power plant is plausible and aligns with existing energy strategies. However, the specific implementation involving McDonald’s locations is speculative and lacks supporting evidence from other reputable sources. The article’s claims about the potential benefits and operational details are not corroborated by independent reports, making them less credible.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The article presents a novel application of virtual power plants involving McDonald’s locations, but it lacks independent verification and originates from a niche publication with uncertain credibility. The reliance on unverifiable quotes and the blending of commentary with reporting further undermine its reliability. Given these concerns, the content does not meet the necessary standards for publication under our editorial indemnity.

